Видео

Viktrox is more than double the price her in EU than the Sony :) In the centre the have +- same sharpness. My current combo is 20-70 g f4 (which is superb lens in AF and shrapness) and sony 50 1.8 and im quite happy with this :)

Thank you Oma. This is very helpful.

Very nice job overall, and for the review and for your food photos! I think in close to average distances 100pro is totally fine/great, but the main point of buying 200pro vs 100pro is when you want to light lets say a big place from way behind like a venue/children theater and you will have to use 100pro at 1/2 and full power all the time. You can easily need 2 or 3 batteries for 100pro and also come across overheating issues (lets also not forget that batteries life decline as you use them and the full power shots wont be 360 for ever). With 200pro you will have to worry much much less about these things.

Oma, where are you? Missing your videos. Please make more!

both have the same estabilization

great video

Thanks for your video, it’s so helpful. 👍 But, please, do something with color correction of your videos. This is sony’s color, yellow-green skin tone .

Yani siz 7artisans 60mm kibarca tavsiye ediyorsunuz. Ve gördüğüm kadarı ile bir çok alanda 7artisans bayağı iyi. Teşekkür ederim

What camera did you record on? And what manual settings?

What about Tamron 45 mm 1.8?

Bokeh is NOT depth of field!! Further more, if you frame your subject the same with both lenses, i.e. get closer with the 35mm, you'll get the same depth of field. What you are showing is the subject-background separation.

Samy wins!

Great!

Damned calibration uncompatible with GH5S with cage smallrig. !!! too heavy ???

Canon's expertise in color renderings and reproduction is superb in terms of portraiture photography but its lens lineup is over-priced and not entry-friendly with many of its buget-friendly lenses being chronically out-of-stock. Sony has a series problem with color management despit its superb image sensors; it's lagging behind Canon in terms of color renderings.

Roll Achse is konfusing

nikon z6ii for best lens plz tell sir

Hi!! Very great video for beginners 😅 but do you know if this lens fit with a Nikon D5100? Thank you!!!! 🙏🏻

One of the best lens review!

I have a 24-70 sigma but I think I need a good 16-35 mm I have both a Sony a74 and a canon 6D also the adapter, do you recommend to go with the canon?

Ery direct and precise review. Thanks

Thank you, but I didn't see a lot of difference in usage between the two ? Abd the light quality between the two lenses ? I would think that with a bigger softbox the most powerful ad200 would be good ?

Is the fan really needed?

One question though, I observed, you shoot at very high ISO of around 1000, that has affected the image clarity and quality. Just my perspective, maybe it is something of your own liking. Thanks for the info

I think my initial balance was done wrongly. When I turn on my gimble the camera is listing on an right angle. Is there a way to reset this so my camera is in a balanced position? I thank anyone who can help me with this.

First of all I really enjoyed your review but there's something you should know: f/stop on apsc has no EQUIVALENT on full frame. 1.4 is 1.4 no matter the system. F/stop measures the amount of light. Keep up the good work 👍🏻

with one you thnk is better for real estate video, the lowa 9mm vs 10-10 2.8 sigma?

can you compara the laowa vs the nisi?

It’s an okay guide. A little too fast but understands what he needs to portray

The V1 has better recycle time and more flashes before you have to trade batteries. It also has the round head mods, but those are available for the sqaure had flashes to with a 6 dollar adapter. You can eliminate the V1 advantage with a battery pack and makes the TT685ii less than a second recycle time and make it last double to triple the number of flashes depending on which battery pack you get. But the battery pack adds more weight and costs from 35 to 130 dollars. The power outputr is exactly the same between the two 76 watt seconds but the GN number is better for the TT685ii because of the greater amount of zoom in the head . Difficult decision. The cheap one is better because of price but if you try to make it better than the V1, it will cost you more money. If you are going to buy several flashes, the TT685ii is the way to go. But some pros need the V1 for better recycle time. But you have to buy those expensive batteries.

Great video and very clear information, thank you!!

I have both and I prefer the image quality out of the old one. Also, the L version is very weak in construction, very easy to brake.

Could you tell me if the RS3 is compatible with the Nikon D780 and/or the OMD OM-1? Is the RSC2 compatible with these cameras as well?

This shit makes no sense

sir ji bahut achhi jankari....sir ji aapke video me grance nahi hai bilkul cline outputdijh rha hai...camere me kya setting krni pdegi.....s log 3 please🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

This was great - very clear !!

Keep it up bro. One of the best lens comparisons, straight to the point. Congrats!

Hello Oma! I wanted to know at what aperture you usually record with the LAOWA 9MM for real estate. I wanted to know if a 2.8 is enough to keep a large part of the room in focus or should I take it to a special driaphragm.

what is the distortion or the chromatic aberration type thing that we get at max zoom of 210mm? I mean the image isn't much sharp.

Finally a true breakdown of the actual flash units in question. Thanks for the great insight..I know which unit I want to start off with now.

During video focusing, does the Samyang have noticeable noise that could be picked up with mic mounted on top?

Sigma should be embarrassed not supplying a tripod collar with this.

i once got a 13 mini and the camera was WAY better than the 11 pro, here in the test it isnt...

For insect and outdoor pics, the Sony 30 will be better ?

Does godox ad100 pro fits I. The same mount or I have to purchase separately

Where did you get your focus chart? It's really neat!

I think your old video just saved me 200 bucks. I got the whole Sigma trio and lately I got obsessed with bokeh. Was just about to buy one of these 0.95 lenses to complement the 1.4 ones just to get colser to the full frame look, but ... honestly ... seeing how tiny the difference is, I think I'm good.

I bought my 6400 gently used with this kit lens for the price of just the body brand new so the lens was practically free and I've been really pleasantly surprised with how good it looks.

In the 2 comparison photos of the model with the hat and black top it’s strikingly obvious the 35mm is much sharper with better contrast and colours than the 50mm. Very obvious with the hair against the hat, in the 50mm photo her hair just mesh with the black hat where as in 35mm you can clearly see the highlights in her hair. Thanks for this comparison as I was tossing up between the 2 lens but your video made it a no brainer to get the 35mm. Definitely worth the extra cost. Fun fact, the 24mm is exactly the same size in measurements as the 35mm but the 35mm is slightly heavier.

You actually lose 1/3 rd so it is 18 MP